1.6 Strengthen the community

Graphics Format17-Sep-2007

The scholarly community consists of individuals who have helped to advance research and individuals who have undermined it. To try to minimize acts of harm, the U.S. federal government defines research misconduct. Here are the official definitions.*

-> Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them.

-> Falsification is manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes, or changing, or omitting data or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record.

-> Plagiarism is appropriating and using as one's own another person's documented ideas, processes, results, or words without giving appropriate credit, including those obtained through confidential review of others' research proposals and manuscripts.

-> Research misconduct does not include errors of judgment, errors in recording, selection or analysis of data, or opinion.

For further discussion of why it is wrong to "touch up" photos, your instructor may want you to read the optional article by Rossner.

* Office of Science and Technology Policy, accessed by G. Comstock on 8/11/2007 at Federal Policy on Research Misconduct).

Heels

FFP (falsification, fabrication, plagiarism) is not confined to one discipline. Read about a researcher from your discipline who has acted against their own long term interests.


Heroes

Now find--and share with us--a researcher in your field who has done exemplary work on technical and ethical grounds. Heros abound. If you are a botanist, you may, for example, want to nominate Arthur Galston, a graduate student at the University of Illinois in 1943 who studied the chemical processes regulating plant growth. Galston figured out how to hasten ripening in soybeans for Midwest farmers.

Galston, writes Linda Lambeck, "was successful in finding a compound that produced flowering two weeks earlier. But he discovered if he used too high a concentration, it also made the leaves fall off as he noted in his thesis before heading off to serve in World War II."

"He returned to find that someone else had read his work and had the idea patented. His compound and others were the basis for Agent Orange. By the time the Vietnam War arrived, it was ready for use. Millions of gallons were sprayed over Vietnam from 1961 to 1970, exposing the Ho Chi Minh trail and other enemy passageways and causing a tremendous amount of ecological damage."

"Valuable teak trees and mangrove swamps along the estuaries of the delta south of Saigon were stripped and remain so to this day. Once aware of the ecological damage the chemical was causing, Galston and other scientists went to Vietnam. They began to wonder about the effects on people and animals. When they returned, a committee was formed to study the impact of the spraying."

"A November 1967 study Galston led was unable to come to firm conclusions about Agent Orange but advised its continued use might 'be harmful' and have unforeseen consequences. The spraying was stopped in 1970 after Galston and others successfully appealed to the Nixon administration" (Linda Conner Lambeck, Connecticut Post, Dec. 10, 2005, accessed by G. Comstock on 5/15/2007 at Agent Orange Discoverer Tries to Make Amends).


Author: Gary Comstock
Maintained By: Gary Comstock
Last Updated: 2007-09-11